Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Many tests fail with snappy-1.1.4 #1947

Closed
mbakke opened this issue Mar 3, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Many tests fail with snappy-1.1.4 #1947

mbakke opened this issue Mar 3, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@mbakke
Copy link

mbakke commented Mar 3, 2017

Hello,

After updating to snappy version 1.1.4 on my system, this test consistently fails:

Note: Google Test filter = GeneralTableTest.ApproximateOffsetOfCompressed
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from GeneralTableTest
[ RUN      ] GeneralTableTest.ApproximateOffsetOfCompressed
skipping xpress and xpress compression tests
Value 3090 is not in range [2000, 3000]
table/table_test.cc:2331: Failure
Value of: Between(c.ApproximateOffsetOf("k03"), 2000, 3000)
  Actual: false
Expected: true
pure virtual method called
terminate called without an active exception
t/run-table_test-GeneralTableTest.ApproximateOffsetOfCompressed: line 4:  9133 Aborted                 TEST_TMPDIR=$d ./table_test --gtest_filter=GeneralTableTest.ApproximateOffsetOfCompressed

Update: There are many others with similar problems :)

@yiwu-arbug
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for reporting! We are on snappy 1.1.3 and haven't test with 1.1.4. Will investigate.

mbakke added a commit to guix-mirror/guix that referenced this issue Mar 28, 2017
Rocksdb fails to build with this version:
facebook/rocksdb#1947

This reverts commit 9baab9a.
@mbakke mbakke changed the title GeneralTableTest.ApproximateOffsetOfCompressed fails with snappy-1.1.4 Many tests fail with snappy-1.1.4 Apr 12, 2017
@gfosco
Copy link
Contributor

gfosco commented Jan 10, 2018

Closing this via automation due to lack of activity. If discussion is still needed here, please re-open or create a new/updated issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants