Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix assertion failure in FastLocalBloomBitsBuilder #9585

Closed

Conversation

pdillinger
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:
As in

db_stress: table/block_based/filter_policy.cc:316: rocksdb::{anonymous}::FastLocalBloomBitsBuilder::FastLocalBloomBitsBuilder(int, std::atomic<long int>*, std::shared_ptr<rocksdb::CacheReservationManager>, bool): Assertion `millibits_per_key >= 1000' failed.

This assertion failure was actually happening with our RibbonFilterPolicy
which falls back to Bloom for some cases, often for flush, but was
missing new special logic to skip generating filter for 0 bits per key
case. Fixed by adding the logic in other builtin FilterPolicy
implementations.

Test Plan: Updated db_bloom_filter_test to do more integration testing
of the RibbonFilterPolicy ("auto Ribbon") class, incl regression test
this with SkipFilterOnEssentiallyZeroBpk

Summary:
As in

```
db_stress: table/block_based/filter_policy.cc:316:
rocksdb::{anonymous}::FastLocalBloomBitsBuilder::FastLocalBloomBitsBuilder(int,
std::atomic<long int>*,
std::shared_ptr<rocksdb::CacheReservationManager>, bool): Assertion
`millibits_per_key >= 1000' failed.
```

This assertion failure was actually happening with our RibbonFilterPolicy
which falls back to Bloom for some cases, often for flush, but was
missing new special logic to skip generating filter for 0 bits per key
case. Fixed by adding the logic in other builtin FilterPolicy
implementations.

Test Plan: Updated db_bloom_filter_test to do more integration testing
of the RibbonFilterPolicy ("auto Ribbon") class, incl regression test
this with SkipFilterOnEssentiallyZeroBpk
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pdillinger has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

Copy link
Contributor

@ajkr ajkr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants