Fb 9718 verify checksums is ignored #9767
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Having proved that the code gets called and that the statistic we update is reflected at the Java API, we can get going with a fix.
There appear to be others.
Some is invoked by the reading that is done for iteration. What happens if the DB is cached ?
alanpaxton
force-pushed
the
fb-9718-verify-checksums-is-ignored
branch
from
4827128
to
ea79a6c
Compare
|
@jay-zhuang has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #9718
The verify_checksums flag of read_options should be passed to the read options used by the BlockFetcher in a couple of cases where it is not at present. It will now happen (but did not, previously) on iteration and on [multi]get, where a fetcher is created as part of the iterate/get call.
This may result in much better performance in a few workloads where the client chooses to remove verification.