-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Cert manager provided tls certs #571
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
26 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3c18c59
Make use of gardener provided TLS certificates
eberlep abc05fb
...
eberlep 3e94f75
Generate shorter commonName
eberlep 1a295a5
* remove commonName annotation
eberlep e51dc96
Try different annotations
eberlep 2dba281
Add subdomain to commonName
eberlep e500fc4
use wildcard in commonName
eberlep bd25ebc
Use proper dns name instead of wildcard
eberlep 7623905
Naming
eberlep 097582b
Set spilo_fsgroup to fix tls permission issue
eberlep 4f140fb
Add additional annotation
eberlep 1fa6a20
Move annotations to shared LB when both are available
eberlep 16ab026
Reset annotations if neccessary
eberlep 9f76aa0
Update annotations
eberlep 5822ae4
Centralize logic
eberlep d12dd1c
...
eberlep 252d6dd
Merge branch 'main' into gardener-provided-tls-certs
Gerrit91 bc1133d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into gardener-provided-tls-certs
eberlep d97a353
Use certificate CR instead of gardener annotations
eberlep 986c2f8
Set temporariy default value for testing
eberlep 3913ff4
Add log
eberlep 81aa41d
AddToScheme
eberlep 3d1123f
Switch secret name to static string from docs
eberlep 472d04a
* Make TLS subdomain configurable too
eberlep 8168e5c
Remove (test) default value
eberlep 4c678e6
Disable certificate creation when not configured
eberlep File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the old code you executed the
else
block when the value of the IP was an empty string (aka""
) now you enter theif
block . this one looks more correct. i hope this is compatible with existing specs.