Skip to content

Conversation

a-maurice
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Provide details of the change, and generalize the change in the PR title above.

Format the automated test file. This has no functionality change, just formatting.


Testing

Describe how you've tested these changes.

Running tests locally


Type of Change

Place an x the applicable box:

  • Bug fix. Add the issue # below if applicable.
  • New feature. A non-breaking change which adds functionality.
  • Other, such as a build process or documentation change.

Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @a-maurice, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request improves the code readability and maintainability of the automated test file for Firebase AI by applying consistent formatting rules. The changes are purely stylistic, ensuring that all code blocks, including if statements, loops, and method declarations, use explicit curly braces, without introducing any functional modifications to the tests themselves.

Highlights

  • Code Formatting: The primary change involves applying consistent code formatting to the UIHandlerAutomated.cs file, ensuring uniform style across the test suite.
  • Brace Style Consistency: Specifically, curly braces have been added to all single-line if, foreach, namespace, method, and class declarations to enforce a block style, enhancing readability.
  • No Functional Changes: These changes are purely cosmetic and do not alter the functionality or behavior of the automated tests, as explicitly stated in the pull request description.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request focuses on formatting the automated test file UIHandlerAutomated.cs to use a consistent bracing style. The changes are purely stylistic as described.

My review confirms the formatting changes and also points out a few areas for improvement:

  • An if statement was missed in the formatting pass, which I've flagged for consistency.
  • Several hardcoded strings for model names and a magic number for float comparison could be extracted into constants to improve maintainability.
  • The LoadStreamingAsset method can be simplified using async/await and a using block to improve readability and ensure proper resource disposal.

Overall, the formatting is a good step towards consistency. The additional suggestions aim to further improve the code's quality and maintainability.

async Task TestGenerateImage(Backend backend) {
async Task TestGenerateImage(Backend backend)
{
var model = GetFirebaseAI(backend).GetGenerativeModel("gemini-2.0-flash-exp",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The model name "gemini-2.0-flash-exp" is hardcoded. It would be better to define it as a constant at the top of the class, similar to TestModelName, to improve maintainability and avoid magic strings. For example: private readonly string TestGenerateImageModelName = "gemini-2.0-flash-exp";

      var model = GetFirebaseAI(backend).GetGenerativeModel(TestGenerateImageModelName,

@a-maurice a-maurice merged commit df771e6 into main Oct 2, 2025
5 checks passed
@a-maurice a-maurice deleted the am-test_format branch October 2, 2025 21:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant