-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 625
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
forrtl: severe (157): Program Exception - access violation #11110
Comments
I do not see an input file for this case. |
I have updated the comment above with the input file included. |
Jason -- run this case with the new source. It produces an input error. This error is not related to the problem identified in the post. It's just a good example of a complicated input file. |
I see the error. SOOT is redefined in the input file and my guess is the new source is not picking up that the definition didn't redefine the enthalpy. |
Drs. Floyd and McGrattan, you are both correct. I did review the reactant and product information and there are a few unviable elements as it currently standards. I'll work on resolving these. As pertains to the original error on this thread, the following test cases should return the previously mentioned error. Note: Scenario 4A and 4B are nearly identical, the main difference being speeds applied at vents. With this said, Scenario 4B is running, whereas, Scenarios 2 and 4A are not. My apologies for the original confusion. |
There was a stale pointer reference that this case hit. Should be fixed |
FDS Source: Fix setting of EXPLICIT_H_F Issue #11110
Thank you, Jason |
The case Scenario_5A.fds is running with this version:
After addressing the problem Jason identified, is the case now working for you? |
Hi, thanks for the follow up, The first issue with Scenario #5B is ok. There were duplicate SOOT entries, one viable and the other requiring redefinition. I've left it be for now as the correctly defined SOOT entry is working just fine. Regarding the second issue, the stale pointer reference. I haven't had the opportunity to download the most recent FDS build as mine dates back to June and the update was only made last night. Where am I able to download the most recent build to see if the revisions to the source code fixed the issues seen with Scenarios 2, #A and 4B? Fire Dynamics Simulator Current Date : November 15, 2022 15:46:41 MPI Enabled; Number of MPI Processes: 5 MPI version: 3.1 Job TITLE : forrtl: severe (157): Program Exception - access violation ===================================================================================
|
Each night FDS is tested and if it passes, we put test bundles here. I am confused now with all the different cases (5A, 2B, etc). If there is something that is still causing a problem, post that input file. Just post one input file and tell us what the problem is. Also, no need to cut and paste all this "BSD TERMINATION" stuff. This just says that something failed and the job's processes are being shut down. It doesn't help us debug. |
Hi, Kevin, Jason's changes to the source code yesterday evening resolved the errors in Scenarios 2, 4A, and 4B provided in the thread above, Note my apology for any confusion as well :). I'll close the comment thread. Thank you. |
The following error is occurring while attempting to run an FDS test case -
forrtl: severe (157): Program Exception - access violation
Image PC Routine Line Source
fds.exe 00007FF734867DE6 Unknown Unknown Unknown
fds.exe 00007FF7349ADAAE Unknown Unknown Unknown
fds.exe 00007FF73475C502 Unknown Unknown Unknown
fds.exe 00007FF7347287FE Unknown Unknown Unknown
fds.exe 00007FF7350CA8E4 Unknown Unknown Unknown
KERNEL32.DLL 00007FFE8CD67034 Unknown Unknown Unknown
ntdll.dll 00007FFE8D2026A1 Unknown Unknown Unknown
It is unclear what the issue is as the identical test case is working under a separate scenario. If replying to this Gmail account fds.questions@gmail.com with your email address, it will be possible to provide a direct contact to offer the source file.
Thank you.
Scenario_5A.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: