-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 177
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LOADSLICEM reads pressure zone instead of pressure #1433
Comments
Maybe I should mention that this bug has been around a long time, but I haven't found time to report it until now. It does get in the way of postprocessing sometimes. The LOADSLICEM option is a useful fallback, particularly when a slice seems to have fragmented (maybe into slightly different values near the specified z-value, for example, with multiple meshes at different resolutions). This behaviour of fragmented slices (where LOADSLICE only selects one fragment) is another bug I haven't reported, but I think you're aware of it already. |
should be fixed in smokeview posted here. |
submit a simple test case that illustrates the fragmentation problem you
mentioned and I will take a look at it.
…On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 3:16 PM obscureed ***@***.***> wrote:
Maybe I should mention that this bug has been around a long time, but I
haven't found time to report it until now. It does get in the way of
postprocessing sometimes. The LOADSLICEM option is a useful fallback,
particularly when a slice seems to have fragmented (maybe into slightly
different values near the specified z-value, for example, with multiple
meshes at different resolutions). This behaviour of fragmented slices
(where LOADSLICE only selects one fragment) is another bug I haven't
reported, but I think you're aware of it already.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1433 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC6UCRSSVKQHIDVLGNIQG7DV5OEIPANCNFSM6AAAAAAQI4OYWE>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
--
Glenn Forney
|
did the smokeview I posted fix your issue? |
I've tried that test version of smokeview, and it works on the test case I posted: the result of the script is four images, all showing pressure results, as requested. So I'll mark this issue as closed. Thanks for your efforts! |
Here are some steps to recreate a bug in smokeview:
(1) Run the attached FDS model in FDS6.7.9. (This is tunnel0003.fds, renamed as tunnel0003.txt, but I have seen this bug in several models.)
(2) Run the attached smokeview script ("smokeview -script pressures.ssf tunnel0003.smv"). I've renamed pressures.ssf as pressures.txt for transfer.
You can see that the script asks for slices of pressure at z=1.8m then z=1.5m, using two methods: first LOADSLICE, and then LOADSLICEM on each of the three meshes. It is relevant that both PRESSURE and PRESSURE ZONE slices are saved at z=1.8m, but only PRESSURE at z=1.5m. For the LOADSLICEM method at z=1.8m (time 2.0s), the resulting image displays the PRESSURE ZONE results, even though PRESSURE was requested.
tunnel0003.txt
pressures.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: