[wip] Use Json type to represent naked dictionaries #2399
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tracking issue
flyteorg/flyte#5318
Why are the changes needed?
As described in flyteorg/flyte#5318, we can use a json string as the transport for a variety of types, including naked dictionaries.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Leverage the new Json type defined in flyteorg/flyte#5337 to replace the usage of protobuf Struct as the transport for naked dictionaries with a json-encoded string.
Keep in mind that this is WIP. TODO:
How was this patch tested?
Setup process
Screenshots
Check all the applicable boxes
Related PRs
Docs link