Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove duplicate code related to ccache loadfile #1166

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 11, 2022

Conversation

rmaksimov
Copy link
Contributor

I've added the parseFile function to ccache.py and have refactored all the duplicate code in other scripts

@rmaksimov rmaksimov mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2021
@0xdeaddood 0xdeaddood added the in review This issue or pull request is being analyzed label Feb 4, 2022
impacket/krb5/ccache.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
impacket/krb5/ccache.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
impacket/krb5/ccache.py Show resolved Hide resolved
impacket/krb5/ccache.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
impacket/tds.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
0xdeaddood pushed a commit to 0xdeaddood/impacket that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2022
- Parsing v3 and v4 ccache files to check fortra#1106 (and not support for v1 and v2)
- Parsing creds from kirbi to check fortra#1254
- Checking fortra#1166 parseFile function
@0xdeaddood 0xdeaddood mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2022
@rmaksimov
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks for the review, i seem to have fixed all the requested things

@0xdeaddood 0xdeaddood mentioned this pull request Mar 11, 2022
@0xdeaddood 0xdeaddood merged commit 5393619 into fortra:master Mar 11, 2022
@0xdeaddood
Copy link
Collaborator

thanks a lot for this PR @rmaksimov!

@0xdeaddood 0xdeaddood removed the in review This issue or pull request is being analyzed label Mar 11, 2022
@rmaksimov rmaksimov deleted the remove-duplicate-code branch March 11, 2022 16:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants