This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 11, 2021. It is now read-only.
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
TEST: Suggesting the use of external databases: datadotworld #6
Labels
Comments
3 tasks
evaristoc
changed the title
Suggesting the use of external databases: datadotworld
TEST: Suggesting the use of external databases: datadotworld
Oct 24, 2017
@QuincyLarson
|
evaristoc
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 1, 2017
7 tasks
QuincyLarson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 10, 2018
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
This is an exploration of external databases for some of the datasets, following a discussion started at freeCodeCamp/2017-new-coder-survey#7 by @pdurbin.
A demo exercise is being built with my personal data. So far:
pip
of very recent update: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/datadotworldpickle
file -the Python package apparently doesn't handle commands to deal with formats that won't haveread
orreadline
methods; for handling pickle files a more elaborated code would be required (eg. https://pypkg.com/pypi/vecshare/f/vecshare/signatures.py); pickle is very much Python and shouldn't be used, but that means files that were loaded in different formats, like compressed ones, might not be easily extractedIt was found later that the following script would unpickle the pickled file:
pandas
libraryFor more information about datadotworld and similar check the following list: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KptHzDHIdB3s1v5m1mMwphcwXhOVWdkRYdjEWW1dqrE/edit#gid=355072175
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: