Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 6, 2021. It is now read-only.

Commit

Permalink
policy update (#513)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Co-authored-by: Andrew Lee <rasengan@Andrews-MacBook-Air.local>
  • Loading branch information
realrasengan and Andrew Lee authored May 23, 2021
1 parent e48c814 commit 1194a3e
Showing 1 changed file with 9 additions and 5 deletions.
14 changes: 9 additions & 5 deletions content/pages/policies.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -46,7 +46,10 @@ Channel ownership
Channels on freenode fall into one of two categories. Primary channels, which
begin with a single # character, are reserved for on-topic projects. If you’d
like to take over one of these channels, then you’ll need to be associated in
some way with the project in question. Topical, or ‘about’ channels, begin with
some way with the project in question. For abandoned project channels that
have moved or are no longer available to the public, you may request the

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@lanodan

lanodan May 23, 2021

projects channels that have moved

This is dangerously close to what got described in https://www.devever.net/~hl/freenode_abuse

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@bghira

bghira May 23, 2021

^ you mean, having a functioning IRC network? yeah, how dangerous!

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@Oblomov

Oblomov May 23, 2021

Taking over a formerly official channel that has moved elsewhere is disruptive for the community associated with that channel. It's not only dangerous, but wanton unethical.

You know what you should do to have a functioning IRC network? Not piss off your potential user base. This is the opposite of that.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@bghira

bghira May 23, 2021

do you know how many IRC networks have channels that are unaffiliated with the project? get over yourself. i wonder which is more disruptive; migrating to a new network, or just keeping your head down?

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@lanodan

lanodan May 23, 2021

This isn't about unofficial channels.

This is about litterally adding "I reserve the right to take over your channels if you move elsewhere" during the political context of many channels jumping ship out of freenode because of the new managment.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@bghira

bghira May 23, 2021

"your" channels assumes like, some kind of legal ownership. it's a namespace on an IRC network, and if abandoned, it's free to revive by community members. i see no problem here though it'd be nice if it were redirected into a ## namespace, given to the requester.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@riking

riking May 23, 2021

@lanodan that's the plain purpose of this policy change: to legitimize the actions performed.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@lanodan

lanodan May 23, 2021

How is a channel that has recently moved "abandonned"?
Also please, the quote on my original post was precise for a reason.

"your" channels assumes like, some kind of legal ownership.

What in the fuck.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@immibis

immibis May 23, 2021

The word "your" does not imply legal ownership. See: "your wife"

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@bghira

bghira May 24, 2021

sounds like you've all made up your minds. bye!

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@fche

fche May 24, 2021

How is a channel that has recently moved "abandoned"?

That is literally what it is. If some community decides to LEAVE freenode for whatever reason, they thereby abandon any benefits from freenode too.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@JonnoFTW

JonnoFTW May 25, 2021

Things move for a reason. Allowing people to take over channels that have moved provides a convenient security hole whereby malicious actors can easily impersonate the real staff/project owners. Project owners should be able to declare that they have moved and lock the channel to prevent abuse.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@BluePlastics

BluePlastics May 25, 2021

sounds like you've all made up your minds. bye!

Sorry but official channel names that have left Freenode should be locked to prevent abuse, others have tried telling you this, but it seems you are either ignorant to how it could be abused or a shill for those who have taken over Freenode and are willing to open it up to this sort of abuse.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@Sophist-UK

Sophist-UK May 25, 2021

sounds like you've all made up your minds. bye!

Sounds like you don't have the logic or evidence to back up your claims and are running away rather than justify your position.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@dtantsur

dtantsur May 26, 2021

"your" channels assumes like, some kind of legal ownership.

Google trademarks. You can get in trouble for registering say "ubuntu" for your own purpose.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@bghira

bghira May 30, 2021

@dtantsur wat? Ubuntu is a word from Zulu.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@dtantsur

dtantsur May 31, 2021

wat? Ubuntu is a word from Zulu.

Most trademarks are words from some language, that does not prevent them from being enforced. I mentioned Ubuntu specifically because they're very picky about their trademark policies, google it if you don't believe me.

ownership of the channel be transferred to you. Please make said requests in
the #freenode IRC channel. Topical, or ‘about’ channels, begin with
two # characters, and these are allocated on a first-come, first-served basis to
the first person who registers it with ChanServ. As with nicknames, however, we
reserve the right to remove or alter registrations where we believe they have
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -81,10 +84,11 @@ applicable where freenode operates. Use of freenode and its facilities is a
privilege, not a right, and may be withdrawn where we believe that this has not
been the case.

Unlawful activities and related support activities are considered off-topic, as are
inappropriate advertising, heavy media file trading, proprietary game software modding,
warez, porn and various forms of antisocial behaviour, including (but not limited to)
political, racial, ethnic, religious or gender-related invective.
Off topic channels are required to act in good faith in accordance to the freenode
community as a whole. Unlawful activities and related support activities are considered
off-topic, as are inappropriate advertising such as unused channels for the purpose of
polluting the channel list results, transmission of illicit content such as warez or
illegal content, spam, or squatting a namespace preventing others from utilizing it.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@TapeWerm

TapeWerm May 25, 2021

Pretty pathetic in a time when there's more crap thrown towards us than ever that the new owner decides to drop rules against racism and other forms of douchebaggery. I don't like to get self righteous, but this is a shamefully low bar to get clipped by. I can't say I've stuck up for myself very well against anti-Asian racism, but I can say I didn't buy an IRC network with Bitcoin money and backspace a rule against racism against my own people.

Edit: There is another mention of this still in the policy, so disregard this post.


In accordance with UK law freenode has no tolerance for any activity that could be construed
as:
Expand Down

31 comments on commit 1194a3e

@riking
Copy link

@riking riking commented on 1194a3e May 23, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Expanded form of diff in the second section. ⚠️ This is an extremely large change.

+Off topic channels are required to act in good faith in accordance to the freenode community as a whole.
 Unlawful activities and related support activities are considered off-topic, as are
-inappropriate advertising,
+inappropriate advertising such as unused channels for the purpose of polluting the channel list results,
-heavy media file trading,
-proprietary game software modding,
-warez,
+transmission of illicit content such as warez or illegal content,
-porn and
-various forms of antisocial behaviour, including (but not limited to) political, racial, ethnic, religious or gender-related invective
+spam, or
+squatting a namespace preventing others from utilizing it.

This is a monsterously large policy diff

@kevr
Copy link

@kevr kevr commented on 1194a3e May 24, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The world has records of your violations and follow-up cover-up commit. This does not change your actions, Andrew.

@bghira
Copy link

@bghira bghira commented on 1194a3e May 24, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"violations" need to be taken in context. the channel that was "taken away" from the person who abandoned it, was purely a bot feed channel for hacker news.

that's it.

it's a bit different from what people are making it out to be - the previous admin left a note in the topic, and didn't plan on returning. only after they were alerted to what had transpired, they returned to see their channel access list had changed. and why shouldn't it be? it's a general purpose channel, and why should people have to go to Libera for it?

so, you're right, the policy doesn't change his actions. but his actions were reasonable.

@Sophist-UK
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am amazed by the speed at which this news is travelling and by how quickly channels are migrating away.

@Sophist-UK
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so, you're right, the policy doesn't change his actions. but his actions were reasonable.

Nope. It was an abuse of power by Andrew Lee for his own benefit. Just because a channel has decided to move elsewhere does NOT make it an abandoned channel.

Supposing (if I had the money) I was going to buy a second home and closed my first home and locked it up, and moved to the second home, does that give the local mayor the right forcibly to take ownership for their own personal benefit? Perhaps after a few decades of no maintenance, when the roof had collapsed, the local council might decide that it had become a hazard and that - having tried and failed to contact the owner and get them to act responsibly - for the safety of the community as a whole, the council acting for the community (and not the mayor acting in their own personal interests) might take ownership - through due process and the courts - and demolish it.

Can you see the difference? One is an abuse of power for personal gain, the other a safety measure by the community for the community,

@fche
Copy link

@fche fche commented on 1194a3e May 24, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are a guest at freenode and at the other irc networks, so maybe a better analogy is a homeless guy moving from tent to tent.

@Sophist-UK
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No - more like a bit of a free-for-all land area, where people grab some land and build a house and soon you have a town. People invest time in creating a channel with a user community.

Freenode didn't say to people come along and use our services, but we can ban you for no reason and if you invest time in creating a channel we can take it over for our own benefit at any point. Instead they made promises about being welcoming to people, protecting their privacy, acting as responsible owners, and giving them channel ownership rights - and people trusted those promises.

And then some upstart gains ownership and decides to renege on those previous promises. Sorry - but just because your are a rich arsehole who gets legal ownership, that doesn't give you the moral or ethical right - and perhaps not even the legal right, though I doubt anyone is going to waste money on legal action - to renege on previous agreements.

@Sophist-UK
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh - and to be valid, changes to this policy need to meet the requirements of the previous policy, and this commit does not reach that standard for various reasons.

So, at this moment in time, the changes in this policy do not apply to the vast majority of freenode users, if indeed it applies to any. And therefore any actions by Andrew Lee or his staff that are contrary to the previous version of the policy - like taking over a channel they claim as abandoned - are therefore contrary to stated policy.

Additionally, the definition of an "abandoned channel" is not clearly defined - it can be argued that a channel which has been deliberately locked with a redirection notice is NOT abandoned as it is performing a valid function even though no one can join it. The policy clearly states that inactive primary channels do not expire, but does not state how long a channel needs to be empty to be considered "inactive" - is a channel empty for 1 second inactive and available (for that second) to be claimed by someone else?

So even if the policy changes in this commit were valid - and they are not because the previous policy's requirements for changes have not been followed - but even if they were, I do not personally believe that they allow Andrew Lee to take the actions he has already taken as described above.

In the end the bottom line is that communities operate on trust - and trust in FreeNode is evaporating faster than a teaspoon of water in the Sahara dessert.

@kevr
Copy link

@kevr kevr commented on 1194a3e May 25, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"violations" need to be taken in context. the channel that was "taken away" from the person who abandoned it, was purely a bot feed channel for hacker news.

that's it.

it's a bit different from what people are making it out to be - the previous admin left a note in the topic, and didn't plan on returning. only after they were alerted to what had transpired, they returned to see their channel access list had changed. and why shouldn't it be? it's a general purpose channel, and why should people have to go to Libera for it?

so, you're right, the policy doesn't change his actions. but his actions were reasonable.

Please read the HN thread about this topic. It has, in fact been pointed out, that his actions were against Freenode policy. There is no conversation about that; that is what happened. Official channels are != Unofficial channels.

@Sophist-UK
Copy link

@Sophist-UK Sophist-UK commented on 1194a3e May 25, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No - Andrew Lee's actions were not reasonable.

  1. They are NOT conformant with the existing policy or the changed policy source.
  2. They were for personal gain.
  3. They were done without any due process.
  4. How do you tell when a channel is "official" or "unofficial"? Who decides? On what basis? What are the rules?
  5. What is the definition of abandoned? What is the difference between closing a channel for a vacation and abandoning it? Is it clear cut? What are the rules? Who decides?

A lot of the ethics of open source are rooted in discussion, cooperation, due process and trust for community benefit. So Andrew Lee's unilateral and abrupt approach for personal gain seems pretty contrary to the fundamentals of FOSS.

And please note that all of this has happened in the first couple of days. We haven't yet had any examples surface of personal data being leaked or sold, but apparently there are examples of that from Andrew Lee's other IRC endeavours, so it wouldn't be surprising for such things to emerge in the near future.

@Sophist-UK
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it just me or are we suddenly seeing a LOT of netsplits on Freenode since Andrew Lee took over? Am I being overly paranoid?

@Sophist-UK
Copy link

@Sophist-UK Sophist-UK commented on 1194a3e May 25, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have now had emails advising of comments by two different people, but they are not appearing on this page - suggesting that they have been deleted. Am I being overly paranoid?

Edit: Yes I was being overly paranoid - they were at the top of the page in a different comment section. 😃

@fche
Copy link

@fche fche commented on 1194a3e May 25, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

People invest time in creating a channel with a user community.

People who make public statements defaming their host and tell their user community to leave, should feel no entitlement to ongoing help of any sort from that same host.

@dotnon
Copy link

@dotnon dotnon commented on 1194a3e May 25, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

People who make public statements defaming their host and tell their user community to leave, should feel no entitlement to ongoing help of any sort from that same host.

To be defaming, a statement must be untrue.

@Sophist-UK
Copy link

@Sophist-UK Sophist-UK commented on 1194a3e May 25, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am just amazed at the number of apologists on here who seem to think that the sun shines out of Andrew Lee's ass and will defy logic and all rational arguments made by others in order to declare his actions reasonable.

This is a cult of personality just like Trump - so just what does Andrew Lee need to do before his apologists will admit that he has crossed the line? "Shoot someone in the middle of Fifth Avenue"?

@Sophist-UK
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

People who make public statements defaming their host and tell their user community to leave, should feel no entitlement to ongoing help of any sort from that same host.

That is such an immature and petty approach to life - what you are saying is that excessive retaliation for someone calling you out for your behaviour is acceptable - and consequently that people should be afraid of calling someone else out because of the risk of retaliation. This is nothing short of bullying, and demonstrates a lack of emotional and intellectual maturity for many different reasons.

@kevr
Copy link

@kevr kevr commented on 1194a3e May 26, 2021 via email

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Oblomov
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zonidjan Freenode policy has never been to kick out people and take over channels because the topic said the discussion had moved elsewhere. Which is how the new policy is being implemented.

But don't worry, the more aggressive the new behavior becomes, the more clear it becomes to people why the new Freenode cannot be trusted.

@LiamDawe
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So Freenode has totally hijacked the GamingOnLinux channel, removed it and redirected it to a ## room where we have no control.

Well done Freenode staff, you're terrible.

@fche
Copy link

@fche fche commented on 1194a3e May 26, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So Freenode has totally hijacked the GamingOnLinux channel [...] where we have no control.

They LEFT freenode, so upon what basis are they hoping to keep control?

@LiamDawe
Copy link

@LiamDawe LiamDawe commented on 1194a3e May 26, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They is me, hi, I run GamingOnLinux.

So if a channel decides they wish to open elsewhere, while keeping the other one open for many different reasons, that makes it perfectly okay for Freenode to just take it over, remove it and redirect it? If you don't see how that's a problem, you're an idiot and only enabling poor behaviour. That is a HOSTILE TAKEOVER, it was not approved by us and no communication went our way. The owners of Freenode just decided it was now their channel to do with as they see fit. Completely ridiculous.

How is ANYONE EVER going to trust Freenode again when they pull this shit?

Freenode is fucking dead to me.

@fche
Copy link

@fche fche commented on 1194a3e May 26, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So if a channel decides they wish to open elsewhere

That literally means that they no longer have an official relationship, which is what the # group-channel designates.

@LiamDawe
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unsubscribing. I've said my peace. Freenode is dead. Any good will has vanished due to this ridiculously hostile behaviour.

It's only being done due to fear and a loss of control, it's pathetic.

@mhall119
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So if a channel decides they wish to open elsewhere

That literally means that they no longer have an official relationship, which is what the # group-channel designates.

That would imply that Freenode will not allow projects to host channels on multiple IRC networks, is that right?

@fche
Copy link

@fche fche commented on 1194a3e May 26, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So if a channel decides they wish to open elsewhere
That literally means that they no longer have an official relationship, which is what the # group-channel designates.
That would imply that Freenode will not allow projects to host channels on multiple IRC networks, is that right?

Of course I can't speak for freenode, but MOVE implies DEPARTING. If a project has two official channels, I don't see why freenode would have a problem with that. Do you know of any group/project that is doing that?

@mhall119
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, if it's an actual move then the ops of the channel that is moving should close down the old channels when their move is complete. I don't think anybody has a problem with that.

But the statement I quoted was more broad than that, and would cover anybody with an official presence on more than one IRC network.

Yes I do know FOSS projects that are doing this. For reasons that should be obvious, I won't be listing them by name.

@clavinet
Copy link

@clavinet clavinet commented on 1194a3e May 26, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Of course I can't speak for freenode, but MOVE implies DEPARTING.

When you move, you usually let people know where you can be found afterwards.

@fche
Copy link

@fche fche commented on 1194a3e May 27, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When you move, you usually let people know where you can be found afterwards.

Oh sure, such as on your main project web site that directs people to the new official channel, or hang out on the unofficial ##foo channel. Heck, not having an #foo official-looking channel here HELPS avoid misdirecting people, after all they may not read or believe the /topic, and just talk with others who are there.

@bghira
Copy link

@bghira bghira commented on 1194a3e May 30, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How is ANYONE EVER going to trust Freenode again when they pull this shit?

Freenode is fucking dead to me.

i have no clue, i've been wondering the same thing as I watch people leave the network for one started by those untrustworthy former Freenode staff.

they screwed up so badly that one of their own was able to sell it out from underneath them.

it was the former staff that allowed this to happen by dissolving the PDPC - how can anyone trust them to do it correctly, ever again? they've shown how incompetent they are.

honestly since the network has dropped from 75k to 62k users, it's actually become a better place to hang out and receive or provide assistance to others. it's almost like the really loud whiners who left were all holding us back.

for years after this, people are still going to be coming to Freenode to receive help. the Libera user base will remain an echo chamber - a small subset of the greatness that was once Freenode.

that's why we're unmuting and redirecting # to ##. because it's a great place where people know to come for help. and none of your drama will change that.

@Oblomov
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LOL you guys are so scared to see the numbers drop that you've even hidden the information about number of registered channels and users from the MOTD. You're losing users at a growing rate, and most of those that remain behind belong to one of thee categories:

  1. idlers that haven't actually connected to their bouncer in years;
  2. people that keep a presence to warn other people about the migration, since it's the only safe way to do it without risking a hostile channel takeover from the current Freenode staff;
  3. matrix users that are waiting for the Libera.chat bridge to stabilize.

The only “drama” here is the massive incompetence in managing FLOSS communities that you've so brilliantly demonstrated.

@clavinet
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bghira
why are you upvoting your own post?

Please sign in to comment.