Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated the MultiNode proposal: To take out-of-sync snapshots delegate the incoming http request to backup-leader. #246

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2021

Conversation

ishan16696
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR updated the MultiNode proposal:
To take out-of-sync full/delta snapshots delegate the incoming http request to backup-restore leader and Let the backup-restore leader take/upload the out-of-sync snapshot(full as well as incremental)
I had already created a issue regarding this: gardener/etcd-backup-restore#354

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

NONE

@ishan16696 ishan16696 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 29, 2021 08:00
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Oct 29, 2021
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Oct 29, 2021
@ishan16696 ishan16696 added status/on-hold Issue on hold (e.g. because work was suspended) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Oct 29, 2021
Copy link
Member

@timuthy timuthy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd suggest to first discuss details in gardener/etcd-backup-restore#354 before we move on and merge this PR.

@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Nov 3, 2021
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Nov 3, 2021
…egate the incoming http request to leading-sidecar.
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Nov 4, 2021
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Nov 4, 2021
Copy link
Member

@timuthy timuthy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review labels Nov 4, 2021
@timuthy timuthy merged commit 76be301 into gardener:master Nov 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/on-hold Issue on hold (e.g. because work was suspended)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants