-
One of your dependencies is: This repository does not have a LICENCE, and is therefore (presumably) copyright. I think that might invalidate your MIT licence. I am not a lawyer obviously. As they have been unresponsive to the request for a LICENCE, you can probably sidestep this issue and replace them with the library they forked. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 4 comments
-
Hi! Actually, I though I already fixed this: #74. Why do you think I searched for it and found one occurrence:
It seems it's there because That's not a "real" dependency, thought. It's present only in examples, and even there it's not actually used, directly or indirectly. If you vendor httpexpect, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Looks like we need an upgrade:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ah, so it seems you're using an older release (v2.0.3). The dependency was removed in v2.1.0. The latest release is v2.2.0. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Ah, so it seems you're using an older release (v2.0.3). The dependency was removed in v2.1.0. The latest release is v2.2.0.