-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 276
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AvgGMPE #5367
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apart from the minor comment, LGTM
<logicTreeBranch branchID="b25"> <uncertaintyModel>Campbell2003SHARE</uncertaintyModel> | ||
<uncertaintyWeight>0.20</uncertaintyWeight> | ||
</logicTreeBranch> | ||
<logicTreeBranch branchID="b2"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are you changing an existing test? Wouldn't it be better to add a new one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am reusing an existing test because I wanted to check the difference between the hazard curves obtained from the original logic tree and from the collapsed one. The interesting thing is that in this test using the AvgGMPE produces the same mean curves as before, up to the numeric precision, even if in general the AvgGMPE does NOT produce the same mean curves.
The AvgGMPE computes the geometric mean of the underlying GMPEs, similarly to AvgSA. It is here for experimental purposes. When I will have time, I plan to see if it is usable for risk purposes (it it were, the problem of IMT-dependent weights would be solved, since we could use full enumeration after collapsing the gsim logic tree). This would solve #5354.