Skip to content

[ENH] Add group_by parameter to structural_elements_from_borehole_set and plotting improvements #1025

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 10, 2025

Conversation

Leguark
Copy link
Member

@Leguark Leguark commented May 10, 2025

Description

Added support for grouping boreholes by different criteria in the structural_elements_from_borehole_set function by adding a group_by parameter with options 'component lith' or 'lith_ids' (default). Also improved type hinting in the Grid class for active_grids property and added visualization code for contour plotting with custom color levels in the activator functions test module.

Relates to #undefined

Checklist

  • My code uses type hinting for function and method arguments and return values.
  • I have created tests which cover my code.
  • The test code either 1. demonstrates at least one valuable use case (e.g. integration tests)
    or 2. verifies that outputs are as expected for given inputs (e.g. unit tests).
  • New tests pass locally with my changes.

Leguark added 4 commits May 9, 2025 16:01
Added type hints to `active_grids` getter and setter, improving code readability and enabling better type checking. This enhancement ensures consistency in type usage for the `active_grids` property.
Introduce a `group_by` parameter with `Literal` typing in `structural_elements_from_borehole_set` for flexible grouping. Also, add dotenv initialization in the example script to manage environment variables.
Copy link
Member Author

Leguark commented May 10, 2025

@Leguark Leguark changed the title [ENH] Add type hints to active_grids property in grid.py [ENH] Add group_by parameter to structural_elements_from_borehole_set and plotting improvements May 10, 2025
@Leguark Leguark marked this pull request as ready for review May 10, 2025 10:52
@graphite-app graphite-app bot added the gempy 3 Will come with the next major update label May 10, 2025
Copy link

graphite-app bot commented May 10, 2025

Graphite Automations

"Add gempy label" took an action on this PR • (05/10/25)

1 label was added to this PR based on Miguel de la Varga's automation.

Copy link
Member Author

Leguark commented May 10, 2025

Merge activity

  • May 10, 7:15 AM EDT: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.

@Leguark Leguark merged commit 61b804b into main May 10, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
gempy 3 Will come with the next major update
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant