Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 31, 2020. It is now read-only.

missed supporting reads #88

Closed
helloeoh001 opened this issue Apr 16, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

missed supporting reads #88

helloeoh001 opened this issue Apr 16, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@helloeoh001
Copy link

Hello,

I'm using pindel to detect tandem duplication frequently occurring in FLT3 gene in leukemia.

The size of duplicated sequence in my data is about 60bp, and the number of supporting read was about 140 when checking the bam file with IGH viewer.

However, only 90 of the them were detected by pindel, and most of the supporting reads on the left side were missed (refer to the figure below).

I need correct number of supporting reads to calculate VAF.

Please help me~

Thanks in advance

image

@liangkaiye
Copy link
Contributor

liangkaiye commented Apr 16, 2018 via email

@philip-holmgren
Copy link

Hi,

I think this is related to the issue I raised (#86).

In that case the reason why the left reads were 'missed' is because they are used as the 'mapped' read to find the 'unmapped' read which would be the right read of the pair (using 'mapped' and 'unmapped' here in reference to the description of the Pindel algorithm).

As far as I know the 'mapped' read is never taken into account for Pindel's VAF calculation although it's quite possible that read also contains the ITD and is softclipped.

@helloeoh001
Copy link
Author

Dr. Ye,

I e-mailed you with the link that the bam file can be downloaded.

If there are any troubles in downloading, let me know.

@liangkaiye
Copy link
Contributor

liangkaiye commented Apr 17, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants