Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kernel-2.eclass: correct link to the deblob script #2953

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zetok
Copy link
Contributor

@zetok zetok commented Nov 29, 2016

An incorrect link was used when getting deblob script, which resulted in
an experience of things "constantly breaking".

Meanwhile, all that was required to make it work was to ask upstream
about the correct place to get the stuff from.

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request assignment

Areas affected: ebuilds, eclasses
Packages affected: sys-kernel/gentoo-sources

sys-kernel/gentoo-sources: @gentoo/kernel

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot gentoo-repo-qa-bot added the assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). label Nov 29, 2016
@monsieurp
Copy link
Contributor

Hi. eclass changes are to be discussed on the gentoo-dev mailing list. Could you send your patch there as well? Thanks!

An incorrect link was used when getting deblob script, which resulted in
an experience of things "constantly breaking".

Meanwhile, all that was required to make it work was to ask upstream
about the correct place to get the stuff from.
@zetok
Copy link
Contributor Author

zetok commented Dec 11, 2016

Hi. eclass changes are to be discussed on the gentoo-dev mailing list. Could you send your patch there as well? Thanks!

Sorry, that sounds too bothersome.

@floppym
Copy link
Contributor

floppym commented Dec 31, 2016

Sorry, that sounds too bothersome.

Closing this then.

@floppym floppym closed this Dec 31, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s).
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants