Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review workflow documentation #65

Closed
archaeogeek opened this issue Sep 18, 2019 · 8 comments
Closed

Review workflow documentation #65

archaeogeek opened this issue Sep 18, 2019 · 8 comments

Comments

@archaeogeek
Copy link
Contributor

This page is blank: https://geonetwork-opensource.org/manuals/trunk/en/user-guide/workflow/versioning.html but the whole Workflow section at https://geonetwork-opensource.org/manuals/trunk/en/user-guide/workflow/index.html probably needs updating

@archaeogeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

See also geonetwork/core-geonetwork#3592

@archaeogeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fxprunayre is versioning deprecated in 4.0.x onwards? (The code seems to suggest it is)

@archaeogeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

See also #138

@fxprunayre
Copy link
Member

When we speak about versioning there is various topics. Now 3.12 or 4.x are mainly relying on database status when history is enabled from the settings (http://localhost:8080/srv/eng/admin.console?debug#/dashboard/versioning).

But we still have some SVN support (probably unused?) but still partially working - yesterday testing geonetwork/core-geonetwork#7017 the subversion repository is still created but the Jeeves API looks broken - so probably something to cleanup.

@archaeogeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Indeed- this is specifically checking SVN rather than the newer workflow history I think. In 3.10.x there is a blue javascript message present in admin console -> statistics and status -> versioning when SVN is not enabled (though I didn't check what happens when I enable it because that particular system is live) but in 4.2.x the message seems to be hidden when SVN is enabled but no events seem to be recorded.

I'm in favour of marking SVN support as deprecated and focusing more on Workflow- what do you think?

@fxprunayre
Copy link
Member

I was also discussing yesterday with @josegar74 and @juanluisrp to drop SVN specific code.

@archaeogeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

SVN section marked as deprecated in 7fea1e4

@archaeogeek archaeogeek changed the title Change log review: (3.6.0): Workflow needs documenting Review workflow documentation Apr 25, 2023
@archaeogeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Addressed in #238

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants