-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: match css property #60
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update introduces enhancements to CSS handling, notably in testing CSS property values with variables and expanding snippet context support for CSS. A new test function ensures CSS property values can be effectively tested with variables, while the addition of a snippet context string aims to improve the parsing and understanding of CSS code, especially when dealing with custom properties or variables. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- crates/core/src/test.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/language/src/css.rs (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
crates/language/src/css.rs (2)
- 56-56: The addition of the new snippet context string
"GRIT_BLOCK { GRIT_PROPERTY: "
is a significant enhancement for handling CSS properties involving variables. However, it's essential to ensure consistency and clarity in the naming and usage of these context strings. Consider adding a comment explaining the specific use case or scenario where this new context string is beneficial. This will help future developers understand its purpose and application within the project.- 79-89: The test case
import_variable
is a valuable addition for verifying the handling of CSS variables. It's well-structured and follows good testing practices. However, there are a couple of points to consider for improvement:
Test Case Naming: The name
import_variable
might be slightly misleading since it suggests the test is about importing a variable, whereas it's actually testing the parsing of a CSS variable. Consider renaming it to more accurately reflect the test's purpose, such asparse_css_variable
.Assertion Details: While
assert!(!nodes.is_empty());
effectively checks that the parsing produces some nodes, it might be beneficial to add more detailed assertions. For example, verifying the specific type of node expected or the content of the node could make the test more robust and informative.crates/core/src/test.rs (1)
- 12729-12749: The test function
css_property_value
is well-structured and follows best practices for writing tests. It's clear and concise, making good use oftrim_margin().unwrap()
for readability. However, consider adding comments to explain the purpose of the test and the significance of the pattern and source being used. This will enhance maintainability and clarity for future contributors.
matches css property, closes: #59
Summary by CodeRabbit