Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add checks for tests and string comments to PR template #5764

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 6, 2023

Conversation

seadowg
Copy link
Member

@seadowg seadowg commented Oct 4, 2023

I think being more explicit about these will be useful for external contributors.

@@ -4,11 +4,9 @@ Closes #
Thank you for contributing to ODK Collect!

Before sending this PR, please read
https://github.com/getodk/collect/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
https://github.com/getodk/collect/blob/master/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This had moved which definitely wouldn't help!

-->

#### What has been done to verify that this works as intended?
Copy link
Member Author

@seadowg seadowg Oct 4, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've switched this for a checklist item so that it's clear that tests are the default and that manual checking would be an exception that would need to be justified.

@seadowg seadowg marked this pull request as ready for review October 4, 2023 10:55
@seadowg seadowg changed the title Add checks for tests and string comments Add checks for tests and string comments to PR template Oct 4, 2023
@seadowg seadowg removed the request for review from lognaturel October 6, 2023 17:01
@seadowg seadowg merged commit 784edd5 into getodk:master Oct 6, 2023
@seadowg seadowg deleted the update-pr-template branch October 6, 2023 17:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants