-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 354
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove readonly properties #497
remove readonly properties #497
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #497 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 6 6
Lines 2292 2305 +13
=========================================
+ Hits 2292 2305 +13
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
tests fail, #495 should fix it |
I'm concerned that we'll break user-land code by taking these away. Given the impacts of past clean up changes, we've seen that user-land code is using several internals (eg. |
also a valid argument any ideas how to create a property without a class instance? |
you can do something like this to deprecate these module attributes: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0562/ |
Sounds like an idea, I will try it |
@markstory |
# Conflicts: # CHANGES # responses/__init__.py
@markstory |
currently we expose 2 attributes, users may think that changing them will affect something, but it is not
best example to show:
produces