You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I had Zola version v0.15.3 and updated it to v0.16.1. The old version had a bug where the processed images were black and white which was fixed with the update. However, because Zola caches the images, it did not automatically fix the cached images.
I think that the images should contain information about the Zola version that generated them so they are regenerated if there is an update.
Additionally, I do not like that the image names of the resized images are hashed and do not contain the original image name at all. I think this is bad for SEO
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We could name them {original_hash}.hash.{ext}? I don't think the hash should contain the zola version though, some people have a huge amount of images and they don't want to re-process them on every Zola update. It's easy to do as an opt-in feature though, just delete the processed folder and let Zola re-do it
I had Zola version v0.15.3 and updated it to v0.16.1. The old version had a bug where the processed images were black and white which was fixed with the update. However, because Zola caches the images, it did not automatically fix the cached images.
I think that the images should contain information about the Zola version that generated them so they are regenerated if there is an update.
Additionally, I do not like that the image names of the resized images are hashed and do not contain the original image name at all. I think this is bad for SEO
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: