-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 916
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prefer constant pointers for descriptors? #20
Labels
type: question
Further information is requested
Comments
mitchmindtree
pushed a commit
to mitchmindtree/wgpu
that referenced
this issue
Feb 23, 2020
kvark
pushed a commit
to kvark/wgpu
that referenced
this issue
Jun 3, 2021
20: Update to latest wgpu-native r=kvark a=rukai Co-authored-by: Rukai <rubickent@gmail.com>
cwfitzgerald
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 26, 2023
Wumpf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 9, 2024
* docs: sync. `wgpu/Cargo.toml` feature comments with `lib.rs` * Revert "docs: inline `document-features` usage, remove dep." This reverts commit 3d5bec6, with an update to `document-features`, and preferring to keep new `feature` content. To be clear, the only difference I have observed is the addition of the `serde` feature. In case it shortens anyone's search, the specific issue resolved is [`slint-ui/document-features`#20](slint-ui/document-features#20).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We shouldn't need to copy descriptors to control ownership on the Rust side, so I think it might generally be more efficient to accept
const WGPUDeviceDescriptor *desc
for example.However for the remote use case, how do we need to handle descriptors, or binary data in general? Do we assume all of these will exist in shared memory and we get pointers directly to them? Or would descriptors be serialized?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: