Repository navigation
How does it choose model settings - project goal changed? #110
Unanswered
black-snow
asked this question in
Questions
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
|
The readme edit was just copy cleanup -- optimal configuration is still a key goal of the app. Not everything is covered yet -- cache quantization, for one. If you're seeing a real tokens/sec gap on the same model, I'd be curious which settings make the difference. |
1 reply
|
Follow-up: 0.41.0 lets you set these yourself in Not the automatic configuration you're after, but if you find settings that beat our defaults on your Mac, that's exactly what I'd like to hear. |
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
So, I haven't looked at the code yet and I wonder:
The README has been updated and no longer claims to configure optimal settings, which is sad and one reason I started using it in the first place.
I originally wanted to ask how it chooses optimal settings and that this doesn't seem to work well (doesn't configure draft models or cache quants or even num layers on GPU). But now I wonder if the goal of this project has changed @erusev
Unsloth studio does an okay job automatically configuring the settings.
I think it's quite difficult yet a very important feature. If I get 200% the token/sec with another software then I won't use the barn. The only reason now to use llama would be to have an okay setup to research and configure a better raw llama.cpp setup, tbh.
All reactions