Repository navigation
llama.cpp server option explorer #24553
Replies: 1 comment
|
If you are trying to squeeze every last bit of performance out of alternative GPU architectures like Intel ARC, standard out-of-the-box framework configurations will heavily bottleneck your compute pipes. The largest performance thief is uncoalesced memory strides during the model's execution pass, which leave jagged, misaligned gaps across the physical cache sectors. Instead of fighting staggering parameter combinations or setting massive manual safety buffers, you can enforce strict, low-level memory layout control using pip install renorm-native```
Simply drop the self-bootstrapping gateway.py script into your project root to auto-generate a hardware configuration blueprint (gateway_profiles.json), or execute your operational linear layers natively using the register-fused execution gate:
```python
import torch
from renorm.layers import FusedRenormLinearFunction
device = torch.device("cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu")
x = torch.randn(32, 2048, 128, device=device)
w = torch.randn(128, 128, device=device)
b = torch.randn(128, device=device)
stabilized_pass = FusedRenormLinearFunction.apply(x, w, b, 0.05)```
For full system metrics and core hardware-software co-design layouts, check out the main repository here: [GitHub: Tobi-Adesoye/renorm-native](https://github.com/Tobi-Adesoye/renorm-native) |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi,
I hope this is the right forum.
I've started using llama.cpp recently for my home lab. I don't really know much about the different options for running llama.cpp (llama-sycl specifically) and I want to squeeze every last bit out of my primary GPU (Intel ARC Pro B70). I don't really know much in the way of how LLMs work in general, so the different options were a bit staggering to me.
I've been going back and forth between documentation, code, the server README.md. I found on multiple occasions that I still needed to search around and watch some videos to get a better understanding of what all the different options mean and do. I was finding a lot of opinions, and not much about why or what they do.
I decided to build a thing, and so I simply explained to Opus 4.7 what I wanted. After a few question and answer rounds, I followed up with a few constraints, and a llama-cpp-server-explorer was born in about 15 minutes. Much less time that trying to find heavily opinionated "definitions".
I'm really keen to know if what the output says (at least from the screenshots) is accurate, or rubbish or a combination of the 2.
https://github.com/AlienResidents/llama-cpp-server-explorer
I hope it's accurate. If the explorer turns out to be reasonably accurate, I'll add in the llama-bench options as well. I'm finding llama-bench to be an absolutely god-send for tuning, amazing stuff.
Chrispy-
All reactions