Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any comment about upcoming Git Rev News edition 103 #660

Closed
chriscool opened this issue Sep 1, 2023 · 17 comments
Closed

Any comment about upcoming Git Rev News edition 103 #660

chriscool opened this issue Sep 1, 2023 · 17 comments

Comments

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator

A currently mostly empty draft is there:

https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-103.md

Feel free to comment in this issue, suggest topics, suggest persons to interview, or use the edit button (that looks like a pen) to edit and create a pull request with the changes you would like.

Let's try to publish this edition on Wednesday September 27th 2023!

Thanks!

cc @jnareb @mjaix @sivaraam @gitster

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Suggestion by @jnareb from previous edition issue:

Fetching too many tags? - contains interesting info about how Git fetches from remote repository

@jnareb
Copy link
Member

jnareb commented Sep 25, 2023

Would this issue include conclusion of Google Summer of Code (GSoC 2023) program for Git, or is it too early?

@sivaraam
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the nudge, @jnareb. I think we're good to write about this in this edition.

If someone doesn't beat me to it, I'll look into opening a PR adding the GSoC conclusion :-)

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@sivaraam thanks for writing about the GSoC conclusion!

@jnareb for your information the GSoC might not be finished for some projects as the timeline could be extended from 10 weeks up to 22 weeks, but it's finished for the 2 contributors who worked on Git and passed the final evaluation.

@sivaraam
Copy link
Member

sivaraam commented Sep 26, 2023

I've raised the PR #664 to add the conclusion of GSoC 2023.

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks @sivaraam, PR #664 is merged.

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Draft email sent: https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAP8UFD1qDet8OPKYgk6dgibPT4PW=AeO7T3h=_vz5uYnEOzO3Q@mail.gmail.com/

I also emailed @ttaylorr to get a link to a read only version of the Git Contributor's Summit (which happened last Tuesday and Wednesday) notes.

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Suggestion by @jnareb from previous edition issue:

Fetching too many tags? - contains interesting info about how Git fetches from remote repository

Thanks @jnareb for the suggestion! The article I wrote is about this.

@jnareb
Copy link
Member

jnareb commented Sep 30, 2023

My links have landed in 3b524c7 (might add part 2, currently Internet too flaky for me to check few of saved links - or there are problems with access to those sites from my part of Internet).

BTW, on Git Virtual Contributor's Summit 2023 there was talk about maybe relaxing handing of Git trademark... and those links include tools and services with "Git" in their name: Gitness, Gitopia, GitButler, Gitamic, git-ssb.

@mjaix
Copy link
Contributor

mjaix commented Oct 1, 2023 via email

@jnareb
Copy link
Member

jnareb commented Oct 1, 2023

I plan to supply the usual fixes in the early afternoon today (that is, around 15:00).

Thanks for the information, but 15:00 in what timezone?

@jnareb
Copy link
Member

jnareb commented Oct 1, 2023

One more link landed in 615e79e, and two more in e1b5705 .

I have not added links to social media (Mastodon ~= federated Twitter/X, Lemmy ~= federated Reddit).

I have also decided not to add “Good Commit” vs “Your Commit”: How to Write a Perfect Git Commit Message, because it is Medium member-only story.

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I plan to supply the usual fixes in the early afternoon today (that is, around 15:00). Sorry for the delay.

No worries. I will wait for them. In the meantime, @stepnem already suggested some fixes that I merged.

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jnareb thanks for the great links!

@mjaix
Copy link
Contributor

mjaix commented Oct 1, 2023 via email

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mjaix thanks for your fixes!

Ok with sending the email version late this evening.

I am going to publish and announce the web version now.

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants
@jnareb @chriscool @mjaix @sivaraam and others