Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 1, 2017. It is now read-only.

Conversation

sigmavirus24
Copy link
Contributor

s/this/these on a couple lines in content/v3/orgs/teams.md

Also added a correction to the ORG json. The original url link was incorrect.

And finally, for editing a team, the status code that is actually returned is 200, not 201.

$ curl "https://api.github.com/orgs/github"
{
  "public_gists": 0,
  "type": "Organization",
  "public_repos": 55,
  "url": "https://api.github.com/orgs/github",
  "blog": "https://github.com/about",
  "avatar_url": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/...",
  "company": null,
  "login": "github",
  "email": "support@github.com",
  "followers": 674,
  "name": "GitHub",
  "created_at": "2008-05-11T04:37:31Z",
  "location": "San Francisco, CA",
  "id": 9919,
  "following": 0,
  "html_url": "https://github.com/github"
}

Note that url is not https://api.github.com/orgs/1 (or any numeral for that
matter). This holds the pattern of https://api.github.com/users/github

(I shortened the avatar_url link since it wasn't relevant.)
API actually returns status code 200.
So far, just from looking at commits on Pull Requests, it seems as if the
'author' and 'committer' fields are returning USER like data structures instead
of the structure that was there previously.
I'm not entirely sure yet that this is the response that is sent, but I'm
guessing that it is. I would have expected this to be documented, but I hope
this will get the attention of someone who can fix it if it isn't correct.
@sigmavirus24
Copy link
Contributor Author

820c3bd was wrong. I hadn't read the surrounding documentation well enough.

@technoweenie
Copy link
Contributor

Yup, thanks! I'll just merge those commits manually and skip 820c3bd.

@sigmavirus24
Copy link
Contributor Author

No problem.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants