Repository navigation
[Coverage Report] Test Coverage Report — 2026-07-27 #6643
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-08-03T16:26:15.125Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Overall Coverage
Assessment: Excellent overall test coverage. The codebase demonstrates strong testing discipline with consistent coverage across all metrics.
🛡️ Security-Critical Path Status
Key Observations:
domain-patterns.tshas 2 untested branch paths (branch coverage: 89.47%)cli.tshas 1 uncovered statement and 1 untested branch path (branch coverage: 50%)📋 Coverage Table
Files with Coverage < 80%: None identified.
Breakdown of Critical Components:
host-iptables.ts: 6 statements, 3 functions, all coveredsquid-config.ts: 4 statements, 2 functions, all covereddocker-manager.ts: 15 statements, 11 functions, all covereddomain-patterns.ts: 25 statements (24 lines), 3 functions, 17/19 branches coveredcli.ts: 7 statements (7 lines), 0 named functions, 1 statement and 1 branch uncovered🔧 Function Audit
host-iptables.ts:
squid-config.ts:
domain-patterns.ts:
cli.ts:
Test Files: 47 test files across the codebase
📅 Recent Source Changes (last 7 days)
✓ Git history indicates stable codebase for critical paths
✓ No recent changes to security-critical files
✓ Existing test coverage maintained across all commits
🔎 Notable Findings
domain-patterns.ts(89.47% branches): 2 untested conditional paths likely representing rare edge casescli.ts(50% branches): 1 untested branch path in a 2-way decision, possibly error handling or exit condition🎯 Recommendations
HIGH — Test domain-patterns.ts branch coverage (2 paths)
MEDIUM — Test cli.ts uncovered statement and branch (1 stmt, 1 branch)
LOW — Document branch path decisions
Generated: 2026-07-27
Repository: github/gh-aw-firewall
Coverage Tool: Istanbul (npm test:coverage)
All reactions