Repository navigation
[uk ai resilience] UK AI Open Code Risk & Resilience Report — 2026-09-08 (recent-changes scope) #59489
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by UK AI Operational Resilience. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #59772. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Executive summary
Recent-changes focus (7-day lookback, since 2026-09-01): 188 commits, 58 security-signal commits, 0 open secret-scanning alerts, 10 open code-scanning alerts, 43 open security-labeled issues. No new critical exposure was found in this window, but the alert-remediation loop is showing systemic friction: several CodeQL findings remain open despite prior "remediated" tracking issues, at least three new code-scanning alerts in actively-changed files have no tracking issue at all, and a 43-issue security backlog (17 of them stale
[container-image-scan]reports) suggests triage throughput, not concealment, is the binding constraint. Per UK AI Open Code guidance, the recommendation is to keep the repository open and improve remediation velocity — not to restrict visibility.Asset graph summary (recent-change scoped)
Recent-change asset graph
pkg/cli/add_package_manifest_imports.gopkg/cli/add_package_manifest_includes.gopkg/workflow/graders_config.gopkg/workflow/mcp_setup_generator.gopkg/cli/project_command.goscripts/ensure-docs-slide-pdf.jsactionlintstepREADME.mdTier classification table
Tier classification
Control verification gaps
add_package_manifest_imports.go), [Custom Engine Test] Test Issue Created by Custom Engine #669/Codex fails to report failure if unauthorised #668 (graders_config.go), [Custom Engine Test] Test Pull Request - Custom Engine Safe Output #667 (add_package_manifest_includes.go) have no matching open tracking issue found in the current open-issues set — a gap in the "classification → control verification" loop for newly introduced findings in this week's commits.go/bad-redirect-checkrecurs as a false positive across path-traversal guards; without a suppression/annotation this pattern will keep generating new untracked alerts (as seen with #674/[Custom Engine Test] Test Issue Created by Custom Engine #669/Codex fails to report failure if unauthorised #668/[Custom Engine Test] Test Pull Request - Custom Engine Safe Output #667).Risk-scoring table and rationale
AI-aware risk scoring
graders_config.go/add_package_manifest_*.gobad-redirect-check alertsensure-docs-slide-pdf.jsuntrusted network writeproject_command.goGraphQL constructionactionlintworkflow-out-of-context alertRationale: none of the findings show high exploit-acceleration potential in isolation; the dominant risk driver is process fragility — alerts persisting past their intended remediation, and new findings entering the pipeline without a tracking issue.
Remediation queue with SLAs
go/bad-redirect-checksuppression or shared helper for path-traversal guards to stop recurring false positives (per #57472)[container-image-scan]backlog (17 open issues) to restore signal-to-noise in the security queueException register
None required this cycle — no Tier D items and no time-bound exception requests identified.
Operational metrics baseline
_This report was generated by the UK AI Open Code Risk & Resilience Governance workflow using a recent-changes focus strategy, per (www.gov.uk/redacted)
All reactions