Repository navigation
[Auto-Triage] Auto-Triage Issues Report #74195
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Auto-Triage Issues. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #74217. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🏷️ Auto-Triage Issues Report Summary
Report date: 2026-11-02
Input: Pre-fetched scheduled-run data: 7 unlabeled issues and 0 partially labeled issues.
Issues processed: 1
Labels submitted: 1
Remaining in this batch: 6 unlabeled issues skipped because GitHub reads were blocked by integrity policy. Repository-wide totals were not measured.
Classification Summary
The label transaction was accepted for downstream application. No other labels were requested for this aggregate report.
Limits and Next Actions
Issues #74192, #74191, #74190, #74189, #74188, and #74187 were skipped after metadata reads were denied by the integrity policy. No alternate read path was attempted. Community eligibility could not be verified for these issues. They require triage in an authorized context.
Coverage was 1 of 7 candidates (14.3%); confidence was high for the one submitted classification. Label distribution: report (1). No issues were flagged needs-triage, since the six skips reflect access limits rather than classification uncertainty. The target of below 5% unlabeled cannot be assessed from this batch.
References: §41499325699
All reactions