Repository navigation
[detection-analysis] Detection Analysis Report — 2026-11-03 #74665
Closed
Replies: 2 comments
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Detection Analysis Report. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #74989. |
0 replies
|
Caveman smoke test here. Fire good. Me run, me happy. 🦴🔥 Warning Firewall blocked 2 domainsThe following domains were blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
To allow these domains, add them to the network:
allowed:
- defaults
- "host.docker.internal"
- "update.googleapis.com"See Network Configuration for more information.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
2026-11-02T23:11:33Zto2026-11-03T23:11:33Z2026-11-03T03:15:50Zto2026-11-03T23:11:33Z(~20h of the 24h window). Collection hit the 1 GB storage budget while paging further back; the earliest ~4 hours of the window (2026-11-02T23:11:33Z–2026-11-03T03:15:50Z) were not collected. All figures below reflect the 656 runs that were analyzed, not the full 24h.gh-aw-detection: false): 1 (0.2%)Note
No misconfigured workflows were detected in the analyzed window.
gh-aw-detectionis disabled on only a single run (one workflow, one occurrence), below the >3-run threshold for flagging, and thedetectionjob itself never failed in any of the 631 runs where it executed.Comparison Chart
Misconfigured Workflows
No misconfigured workflows detected in this window.
View All Run Metrics
148 distinct workflows observed. Top 25 by run count (Total / Detection-enabled / Regular / Success rate / Avg tokens):
The remaining 123 workflows each had 1 run in the analyzed window, including the single regular run: Daily GitHub Docs SEO Optimizer (
gh-aw-detection: false, 1 run, success).Notable non-detection failure clusters worth separate follow-up (not detection misconfigurations — the
detectionjob was not implicated in any of them): PR Finisher (driver-exit failures, ~72% success), Visual Regression Checker (0% success, 7 runs), Daily BYOK Ollama Test, Code Scanning Fixer, and Daily Work Queue Formal Verification.View Historical Trend
Trending history now holds 35 records across 34 distinct UTC days (2026-08-25 to 2026-11-03); 90-day retention dropped nothing this run.
Recommendations
gh-aw-detectionfeature is enabled (explicitly or by default) on 99.8% of observed runs, and itsdetectionjob has a clean track record (0 failures across 631 executions) — the feature itself is not contributing to the ~18.6% overall failure rate seen on detection-enabled runs.2026-11-02T23:11:33Z–2026-11-03T03:15:50Z) once storage budget allows, to confirm no misconfigurations were missed outside the collected ~20h.driver_exitfailures and Visual Regression Checker's 0% success rate are the two biggest reliability gaps in this window and warrant their own triage (outside this report's detection-specific scope).gh-aw-detection: falserun on Daily GitHub Docs SEO Optimizer — if this was a one-off manual override rather than a persistent setting, no action is needed; if it's meant to be permanent, document the rationale in the workflow's frontmatter comments.References:
gh-aw-detection: falserun observedAll reactions