Skip to content

refactor: rename showAccountHostname to showAccountHeader #1464

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 14, 2024

Conversation

setchy
Copy link
Member

@setchy setchy commented Aug 12, 2024

From our simple beginnings as a hostname only account header, we have grown to now show avatar, login name, account-specific quick links and more.

As such, it's time to rename these vars.

The setting rename is somewhat breaking, but given it's a setting that isn't that commonly used (assumption), i think it's OK

Signed-off-by: Adam Setch <adam.setch@outlook.com>
@setchy setchy added this to the Release 5.13.0 milestone Aug 12, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the refactor Refactoring of existing feature label Aug 12, 2024
@setchy setchy changed the title refactor: rename showAccountHostname to showAccountHeader refactor: rename showAccountHostname to showAccountHeader Aug 12, 2024
@bmulholland
Copy link
Collaborator

Isn't there a way to migrate existing setting state? We could add code to port over the setting, if set, and keep it in for a few releases.

@setchy
Copy link
Member Author

setchy commented Aug 14, 2024

Isn't there a way to migrate existing setting state? We could add code to port over the setting, if set, and keep it in for a few releases.

we have account migration logic, but not setting atm. i think we should be ok this time :)

@setchy setchy merged commit 958b01b into main Aug 14, 2024
18 checks passed
@setchy setchy deleted the refactor/show-account-header branch August 14, 2024 13:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refactor Refactoring of existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants