Skip to content

[JetBrains] fix latest terminal integration broken #20009

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mustard-mh
Copy link
Contributor

@mustard-mh mustard-mh commented Jul 8, 2024

Description

Related Issue(s)

Relates private chat
Fixes ENT-426

How to test

Stable Latest
SCR-20240709-dgpw image

Documentation

Preview status

Gitpod was successfully deployed to your preview environment.

Build Options

Build
  • /werft with-werft
    Run the build with werft instead of GHA
  • leeway-no-cache
  • /werft no-test
    Run Leeway with --dont-test
Publish
  • /werft publish-to-npm
  • /werft publish-to-jb-marketplace
Installer
  • analytics=segment
  • with-dedicated-emulation
  • workspace-feature-flags
    Add desired feature flags to the end of the line above, space separated
Preview Environment / Integration Tests
  • /werft with-local-preview
    If enabled this will build install/preview
  • /werft with-preview
  • /werft with-large-vm
  • /werft with-gce-vm
    If enabled this will create the environment on GCE infra
  • /werft preemptible
    Saves cost. Untick this only if you're really sure you need a non-preemtible machine.
  • with-integration-tests=jetbrains
    Valid options are all, workspace, webapp, ide, jetbrains, vscode, ssh. If enabled, with-preview and with-large-vm will be enabled.
  • with-monitoring

/hold

<depends optional="true" config-file="maven.xml">org.jetbrains.idea.maven</depends>
<dependencies>
<plugin id="Git4Idea"/>
<plugin id="org.jetbrains.plugins.terminal"/>
<plugin id="com.jetbrains.codeWithMe"/>
<!-- <plugin id="org.jetbrains.plugins.terminal"/> -->
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should not we remove it or it is required in some cases?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll try if not remove it works

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I misunderstand you question. But I believe to keep new format is a good option, old format (changes we made) is about to fix SharedTerminalService class not found exception.

Not sure how we can detect such case: this plugin requires old format in some versions, it's a break change no 🤕?

@roboquat roboquat merged commit cbf9f08 into main Jul 9, 2024
14 of 15 checks passed
@roboquat roboquat deleted the hw/jb-terminal branch July 9, 2024 07:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants