Skip to content

Add a notice for Meta requirements on screencasts #159

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Arusekk
Copy link

@Arusekk Arusekk commented Jul 25, 2025

This is a minor warning for the curious admin trying to add a more seamless login experience for users.
Do you think this description is worthwhile to include?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Expanded Facebook and Instagram provider setup guides with detailed requirements for public applications, including screencast submission steps and review process expectations.
    • Added a new section to the Instagram setup guide outlining required advanced permissions and scopes for accessing any Instagram account without adding testers.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 25, 2025

@Arusekk is attempting to deploy a commit to the Listinai Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Walkthrough

The documentation for Facebook and Instagram provider setup was expanded to clarify the business verification process for public applications. Both now require a screencast demonstrating specific user interactions and warn about potential multiple review iterations. The Instagram documentation also adds a section detailing the advanced permissions and scopes needed for broader account access.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
pages/providers/facebook.mdx Expanded Step 1 to specify screencast requirements and review expectations for public Facebook apps.
pages/providers/instagram.mdx Added screencast requirements, review warnings, and a new section on advanced permissions and scopes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

A bunny hopped through docs today,
Adding screencast steps along the way.
With scopes and flows now crystal clear,
Reviewers know just what to cheer.
Facebook, Insta—both in sync,
Hop on, dear devs, you’re in the pink! 🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
pages/providers/facebook.mdx (1)

19-25: Polish the wording & improve scannability of the screencast requirements

The current sentence is long, colloquial (“actually”), and a bit hard to parse. Consider re-phrasing and switching to a bullet list so admins can quickly tick the items off when recording the video.

-Please be advised that for public applications, you will need to verify your business,
-and [submit a screencast](https://developers.facebook.com/docs/resp-plat-initiatives/individual-processes/app-review/submission-guide)
-showing log-in to your app, connecting an actual Facebook account,
-clicking the during-connect link to privacy policy, posting something with a comment,
-showing that it actually appears in the feed, and showing the Postiz analytics.
-It can be one long video for all three (Facebook, Instagram (Facebook Business) and Instagram (standalone)) flows.
-Expect many LLM-generated roundtrips with the review team.
+If your app is public you must:
+
+* complete business verification; **and**
+* [submit a screencast](https://developers.facebook.com/docs/resp-plat-initiatives/individual-processes/app-review/submission-guide) that demonstrates  
+  1. logging into the app;  
+  2. connecting a real Facebook account;  
+  3. clicking the privacy-policy link during the connection flow;  
+  4. publishing a post that contains a comment;  
+  5. confirming the post appears in the feed;  
+  6. viewing the post inside Postiz analytics.
+
+One continuous video can cover Facebook, Instagram (Business) and Instagram (Standalone) flows.  
+Be prepared for several review iterations with the Meta team.

This keeps the required actions explicit and removes informal phrasing.

pages/providers/instagram.mdx (3)

26-33: Tighten language & break the sentence into a checklist

Same readability issue as in the Facebook doc. Recommend restructuring:

-Please be advised that for public applications, you will need to verify your business,
-and [submit a screencast](https://developers.facebook.com/docs/resp-plat-initiatives/individual-processes/app-review/submission-guide)
-showing log-in to your app, connecting an actual Instagram account,
-clicking the during-connect link to privacy policy, posting something with a comment,
-showing that it actually appears in the feed, and showing the Postiz analytics.
-It can be one long video for all three (Facebook, Instagram (Facebook Business) and Instagram (standalone)) flows.
-Expect many LLM-generated roundtrips with the review team,
-who might not be very helpful understanding the distinction between the two Instagram flows.
+For public apps you must:
+
+* finish business verification; **and**
+* [submit a screencast](https://developers.facebook.com/docs/resp-plat-initiatives/individual-processes/app-review/submission-guide) that shows  
+  1. logging in;  
+  2. connecting a real Instagram account;  
+  3. clicking the privacy-policy link during connection;  
+  4. publishing a post with a comment;  
+  5. the post appearing in the feed;  
+  6. the post inside Postiz analytics.
+
+One continuous video may cover Facebook, Instagram (Business) and Instagram (Standalone) flows.  
+Expect several review iterations; reviewers sometimes conflate the two Instagram flows.

Removes informal tone and makes the list action-oriented.


166-174: Render the scope list as a fenced code block for consistent formatting

Without fencing, each back-ticked scope renders as an inline code fragment on its own line, which can look uneven. A single code block (like earlier sections) keeps the visual style consistent.

-`instagram_business_basic`
-`instagram_business_content_publish`
-`instagram_business_manage_comments`
-`instagram_business_manage_insights`
+```text
+instagram_business_basic
+instagram_business_content_publish
+instagram_business_manage_comments
+instagram_business_manage_insights
+```

16-18: Fix “Developpers” typo

Minor typo in the link anchor:

-... will require a [Meta for Developpers account]...
+... will require a [Meta for Developers account]...
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5e42136 and 5e3d9fd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pages/providers/facebook.mdx (1 hunks)
  • pages/providers/instagram.mdx (2 hunks)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant