-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
Closed
Labels
FrozenDueToAgeNeedsInvestigationSomeone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.compiler/runtimeIssues related to the Go compiler and/or runtime.Issues related to the Go compiler and/or runtime.
Milestone
Description
#!watchflakes
post <- builder ~ `.*-staticlockranking` && log ~ `lock ordering problem` && log ~ `profInsert`
https://build.golang.org/log/9ef94ae07bd07605e17fcd241ef0d38d5064b41f
https://build.golang.org/log/3f80d959a6cc683334f8521b8a3b002dda1bd6b3
https://build.golang.org/log/a5bfdd06fa69808fe6378b412610e65b06ddd8ff
Taking profInsert
after gscan
is indeed an explicit violation based on our defined lock order: https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/master:src/runtime/mklockrank.go;l=125-138;drc=23c0d30244d5e38d928e68661bf39458eb85d2b2.
That said, I am currently confused about the entire STACKGROW
category (long day, perhaps). As far as I can tell, the gscan "lock" is only ever held from the system stack, so I don't understand how any of these other locks could "grow the stack", or what exactly we are protecting against.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
FrozenDueToAgeNeedsInvestigationSomeone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.compiler/runtimeIssues related to the Go compiler and/or runtime.Issues related to the Go compiler and/or runtime.
Type
Projects
Status
Done
Status
Done
Status
Done