Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Try lint on Python 3 instead of Python 2 #213

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Try lint on Python 3 instead of Python 2 #213

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cclauss
Copy link

@cclauss cclauss commented Apr 4, 2018

Python 3 is more strict on syntax issues than Python 2

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 4, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 91.702% when pulling aad99aa on cclauss:patch-1 into effc2e5 on google:master.

@cclauss
Try lint on Python 3 instead of Python 2
aad99aa 
Python 3 is more strict on syntax issues than Python 2
@cclauss
Copy link
Author

cclauss commented Jan 22, 2019

Closed on favor of #251

@cclauss cclauss closed this Jan 22, 2019
@cclauss cclauss deleted the patch-1 branch January 22, 2019 21:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cla: yes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@cclauss @coveralls @googlebot