Skip to content

Instead of calling Subject.actual(), store the actual value in a field, and read that. #14

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2019

Conversation

cpovirk
Copy link
Member

@cpovirk cpovirk commented May 13, 2019

actual() is being removed.

While there, upgrade to Truth 0.44. The upgade isn't necessary for the actual() migration, but it should reduce the chance that we end up using other methods that are later removed.

…d, and read that.

actual() is being removed.

While there, upgrade to Truth 0.44. The upgade isn't necessary for the actual() migration, but it should reduce the chance that we end up using other methods that are later removed.
@jianglai
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM.

@jianglai jianglai merged commit e457c50 into google:master May 16, 2019
@cpovirk cpovirk deleted the actual branch May 16, 2019 15:59
@cpovirk
Copy link
Member Author

cpovirk commented May 16, 2019

Thanks!

A question for you: I'd like to import this library (with my merged change) version back into the Google depot, as it's blocking the removal of actual() there. Would you like to make a new official release with it, or should I just import a snapshot?

@jianglai
Copy link
Contributor

I'll cut a new release and import to third_party.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants