Skip to content

extensions.md: Make note of the "new" priority system #62

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 2, 2025

Conversation

dconrad5
Copy link
Contributor

Associated with gPodder PR gpodder/gpodder#1698

Copy link
Member

@elelay elelay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good to go once the change is merged in gpodder/gpodder

@auouymous
Copy link
Member

This should mention symlinks. I don't know if shortcuts on Windows would work.

A user can symlink from their directory to the shared extension to change its priority, avoiding the need to copy the extension on each update. They can also symlink user/ 80_command_on_download.py and user/ 80_command_on_download_1.py to share/ 80_command_on_download.py to run two separate commands, changing the priority in them as needed.

@dconrad5
Copy link
Contributor Author

This should mention symlinks. I don't know if shortcuts on Windows would work.

A user can symlink from their directory to the shared extension to change its priority, avoiding the need to copy the extension on each update. They can also symlink user/ 80_command_on_download.py and user/ 80_command_on_download_1.py to share/ 80_command_on_download.py to run two separate commands, changing the priority in them as needed.

Those are both good tricks I didn't even think of! Please see f9cfd14 and b267070.

@auouymous auouymous merged commit c4fd2a0 into gpodder:master May 2, 2025
@auouymous
Copy link
Member

Thanks for implementing this feature.

@dconrad5 dconrad5 deleted the extensions_priority branch August 18, 2025 20:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants