Skip to content

Conversation

mvanlonden
Copy link
Member

#566

Less existence checking when generating types

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 94.537% when pulling d10a580 on mvanlonden:master into f76f38e on graphql-python:master.

4 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 94.537% when pulling d10a580 on mvanlonden:master into f76f38e on graphql-python:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 94.537% when pulling d10a580 on mvanlonden:master into f76f38e on graphql-python:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 94.537% when pulling d10a580 on mvanlonden:master into f76f38e on graphql-python:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 94.537% when pulling d10a580 on mvanlonden:master into f76f38e on graphql-python:master.

@rostero1
Copy link

rostero1 commented Feb 1, 2019

@mvanlonden do you use a different fork of this project? The last commit seems to be from 5 months ago and I'm looking for a fork with this pull request.

@mvanlonden
Copy link
Member Author

@rostero1 no I've just recreated these files locally in my project. The governance for this repo will shift to the community in the upcoming weeks

@mvanlonden
Copy link
Member Author

Closing since you can use required=True #566

@mvanlonden mvanlonden closed this Feb 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants