Updating the decision of the Input Union RFC to RFC #825 using @oneOf #1105
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
Thanks for this addition! Have you hit any trouble with the CLA? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Through search, I kept coming up with this older Input Union RFC when searching for the natural term of "GraphQL Input Union".
I suspect this will be the most popular search term that those unfamiliar with the WG will try, and @OneOf does not meet that naturally at. The first search result on google for me is graphql/graphql-spec#488 - which points to this InputUnion file
This Change
This change just updates the final decision to note the updated RFC for @OneOf which is currently undergoing active dev for inclusion into the release spec.