Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

core: Apply RetryingNameResolver in ManagedChannelImpl #10371

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 12, 2023

Conversation

temawi
Copy link
Contributor

@temawi temawi commented Jul 12, 2023

Wrapping the DnsNameResolver in DnsNameResolverProvider can cause problems to external name resolvers that delegate to a DnsResolver already wrapped in a RetryingNameResolver.

ManagedChannelImpl would end up wrapping these name resolvers again, causing an exception later from a RetryingNameResolver safeguard that checks for double wrapping.

This removes the wrapping logic from DnsNameResolverProvider and has ManagedChannelImpl always explicitly do it.

Wrapping the DnsNameResolver in DnsNameResolverProvider can cause
problems to external name resolvers that delegate to a DnsResolver
already wrapped in RetryingNameResolver. ManagedChannelImpl would
end up wrapping these name resolvers again, causing an exception
later from a RetryingNameResolver safeguard that checks for double
wrapping.
@temawi temawi requested a review from ejona86 July 12, 2023 02:29
Copy link
Member

@ejona86 ejona86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This also fixes the same issue with GoogleCloudToProdNameResolver. Long-term we may wrap things again, but this is a small change that gets things working again while we figure out the appropriate migration strategy.

GrpcUtil.SHARED_CHANNEL_EXECUTOR,
Stopwatch.createUnstarted(),
IS_ANDROID);
// return new RetryingNameResolver(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a bit strange. Remove it or add a comment?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That was an oversight, removed.

@temawi temawi merged commit 78cf1c3 into grpc:master Jul 12, 2023
14 checks passed
@temawi temawi deleted the retryable-nr-in-managedchannel branch July 12, 2023 17:14
temawi added a commit to temawi/grpc-java that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2023
Wrapping the DnsNameResolver in DnsNameResolverProvider can cause
problems to external name resolvers that delegate to a DnsResolver
already wrapped in RetryingNameResolver. ManagedChannelImpl would
end up wrapping these name resolvers again, causing an exception
later from a RetryingNameResolver safeguard that checks for double
wrapping.
temawi added a commit to temawi/grpc-java that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2023
Wrapping the DnsNameResolver in DnsNameResolverProvider can cause
problems to external name resolvers that delegate to a DnsResolver
already wrapped in RetryingNameResolver. ManagedChannelImpl would
end up wrapping these name resolvers again, causing an exception
later from a RetryingNameResolver safeguard that checks for double
wrapping.
temawi added a commit to temawi/grpc-java that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2023
Wrapping the DnsNameResolver in DnsNameResolverProvider can cause
problems to external name resolvers that delegate to a DnsResolver
already wrapped in RetryingNameResolver. ManagedChannelImpl would
end up wrapping these name resolvers again, causing an exception
later from a RetryingNameResolver safeguard that checks for double
wrapping.
temawi added a commit to temawi/grpc-java that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2023
Wrapping the DnsNameResolver in DnsNameResolverProvider can cause
problems to external name resolvers that delegate to a DnsResolver
already wrapped in RetryingNameResolver. ManagedChannelImpl would
end up wrapping these name resolvers again, causing an exception
later from a RetryingNameResolver safeguard that checks for double
wrapping.
temawi added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2023
Wrapping the DnsNameResolver in DnsNameResolverProvider can cause
problems to external name resolvers that delegate to a DnsResolver
already wrapped in RetryingNameResolver. ManagedChannelImpl would
end up wrapping these name resolvers again, causing an exception
later from a RetryingNameResolver safeguard that checks for double
wrapping.
temawi added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2023
Wrapping the DnsNameResolver in DnsNameResolverProvider can cause
problems to external name resolvers that delegate to a DnsResolver
already wrapped in RetryingNameResolver. ManagedChannelImpl would
end up wrapping these name resolvers again, causing an exception
later from a RetryingNameResolver safeguard that checks for double
wrapping.
temawi added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2023
Wrapping the DnsNameResolver in DnsNameResolverProvider can cause
problems to external name resolvers that delegate to a DnsResolver
already wrapped in RetryingNameResolver. ManagedChannelImpl would
end up wrapping these name resolvers again, causing an exception
later from a RetryingNameResolver safeguard that checks for double
wrapping.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 11, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants