Store experimental key in config entry options

[ludeeus]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The updates introduce an "experimental" flag within the config_flow.py file for configuration management and adapt the associated test scenarios to include this new flag. This enables experimental features to be toggled during configuration and ensures that the application's systems and tests properly handle this new option.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
custom_components/hacs/config_flow.py	Modified async methods to include and handle an "experimental" key-value pair within data and options.
tests/snapshots/.../test_full_user_flow_implementation.json	Updated test configurations to include "experimental": true in the options field.
tests/test_config_flow.py	Added handling for the "experimental" key in the options dictionary within the test_options_flow function.

Sequence Diagrams

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant ConfigurationComponent
    participant HACS
    participant TestSuite
    
    User->>ConfigurationComponent: Initiate Configuration
    ConfigurationComponent->>HACS: Call async_step_user (user_input)
    HACS-->>ConfigurationComponent: Include "experimental" key in options
    ConfigurationComponent->>User: Confirm Experimental Feature Option
    
    User->>ConfigurationComponent: Enable Experimental Option
    ConfigurationComponent->>HACS: Call async_step_device_done (user_input)
    HACS-->>ConfigurationComponent: Apply configurations with experimental features
    
    TestSuite->>ConfigurationComponent: Run test_options_flow
    ConfigurationComponent->>TestSuite: Validate "experimental" key in options
    TestSuite-->>ConfigurationComponent: Check for correct behavior

Loading

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 53db143 and da21c44.

Files selected for processing (3)

• custom_components/hacs/config_flow.py (3 hunks)
• tests/snapshots/config_flow/test_full_user_flow_implementation.json (1 hunks)
• tests/test_config_flow.py (3 hunks)

Additional context used

Path-based instructions (1)

tests/snapshots/config_flow/test_full_user_flow_implementation.json (1)

Pattern tests/**/*.json: Never suggest changes to the JSON files located under the tests directory

Additional comments not posted (4)

tests/snapshots/config_flow/test_full_user_flow_implementation.json (1)

11-13: The addition of the "experimental" key in the "options" field aligns with the PR objectives and is correctly implemented.

custom_components/hacs/config_flow.py (2)

188-190: The addition of the "experimental" key in the options dictionary during the async_step_device_done method correctly reflects the PR's objectives. Ensure that this option is handled appropriately in downstream code.

Verification successful

The previous command failed because rg did not recognize the file type python. We need to correct this by specifying the file extension directly.

---

The "experimental" option is indeed handled in the codebase, as evidenced by the search results. The option appears in multiple files, including custom_components/hacs/config_flow.py, custom_components/hacs/utils/data.py, and custom_components/hacs/base.py, indicating it is appropriately managed in downstream code.

• custom_components/hacs/config_flow.py: Lines where "experimental" is set and used.
• custom_components/hacs/utils/data.py: Methods involving experimental content and repositories.
• custom_components/hacs/base.py: Handling of the "experimental" key.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the "experimental" option is handled appropriately in downstream code.
# Test: Search for the handling of the "experimental" option. Expect: Handling code for the "experimental" option.
rg --type python $'experimental'

Length of output: 62

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the "experimental" option is handled appropriately in downstream code.
# Test: Search for the handling of the "experimental" option. Expect: Handling code for the "experimental" option.
rg 'experimental' --glob '*.py'

Length of output: 1710

---

235-235: The addition of the "experimental" key to the options in the async_step_user method is consistent with the PR's objectives.

Verification successful

To verify the handling of the "experimental" option correctly, we need to adjust the rg command to search within Python files. Let's correct the command and re-run the script.

---

The term "experimental" is handled in various parts of the codebase, including tests and utility functions. Here are the relevant locations:

• tests/test_config_flow.py: Lines confirming the presence of "experimental".
• tests/hacsbase/test_configuration.py: Tests related to the experimental setting.
• custom_components/hacs/config_flow.py: The line in question and another occurrence.
• custom_components/hacs/utils/data.py: Methods related to storing experimental content and repositories.
• custom_components/hacs/base.py: Conditional checks and methods for experimental repositories.

These occurrences indicate that the "experimental" option is indeed handled correctly in other parts of the system.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the "experimental" option is handled correctly in other parts of the system.
# Test: Search for the handling of the "experimental" option. Expect: Handling code for the "experimental" option.
rg --type python $'experimental'

Length of output: 62

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the "experimental" option is handled correctly in other parts of the system.
# Test: Search for the handling of the "experimental" option. Expect: Handling code for the "experimental" option.
rg 'experimental' --glob '*.py'

Length of output: 1710

tests/test_config_flow.py (1)

Line range hint 346-357: The addition of the "experimental" key in the options dictionary within the test_options_flow function is correctly implemented and aligns with the changes made in the config_flow.py file.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.