Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add hb-set-fuzzer. #2161

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2020
Merged

Add hb-set-fuzzer. #2161

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2020

Conversation

garretrieger
Copy link
Collaborator

It fuzzes all of the hb_set process methods (intersection, subtraction, union, and symmetric difference).

@ebraminio
Copy link
Collaborator

ebraminio commented Feb 7, 2020 via email

@garretrieger
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think it's better to have each fuzzer specific to the area of code/api it's attempting to fuzz, since the data input will be pretty specific to that api. Setting up additional fuzz targets on oss-fuzz is pretty light weight so no concern there.

I can add a separate fuzzer for hb_map_t.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ebraminio ebraminio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense, can you have a look at -Weverything bot concern?

It fuzzes all of the hb_set process methods (intersection, subtraction, union, and symmetric difference).
@ebraminio
Copy link
Collaborator

Feel free to hb_map_t fuzzer also :)

@garretrieger garretrieger deleted the set_fuzzer branch March 31, 2020 23:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants