Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GEN-188: Release error-stack@0.5.0 #4706

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

TimDiekmann
Copy link
Member

@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann commented Jul 12, 2024

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Two new features were added:

In particular, #4678 is interesting to track down a bug we're internally facing at HASH.

🔍 What does this change?

  • Make sure error-stack is compatible with Rust 1.63
  • Remove deprecated functionality
  • Bump version to 0.5.0
  • Add a --no-verify to the publish job. Verifying is currently broken because error-stack sees the workspace config of edition2024, but it does not use it.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

  • modifies a Cargo-publishable library and I have amended the version

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

  • require changes to docs which are made as part of this PR

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

  • do not affect the execution graph

@github-actions github-actions bot added area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) area/libs > error-stack Affects the `error-stack` crate (library) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) labels Jul 12, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/tests New or updated tests labels Jul 12, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 12, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 20.08%. Comparing base (323e8cc) to head (edd49df).
Report is 869 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
libs/error-stack/src/report.rs 75.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4706      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   19.99%   20.08%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         459      459              
  Lines       15832    15876      +44     
  Branches     2415     2419       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         3166     3188      +22     
- Misses      12625    12647      +22     
  Partials       41       41              
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.48% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 47.41% <ø> (ø)
deer 26.66% <ø> (ø)
error-stack 76.05% <75.00%> (-0.26%) ⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils 4.25% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph 24.87% <ø> (ø)
sarif 89.02% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$1.93 \mathrm{s} \pm 6.90 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.852 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$1.01 \mathrm{s} \pm 5.09 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.484 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$1.01 \mathrm{s} \pm 3.10 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.505 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$38.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 235 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$394 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.53 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.547 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$74.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 472 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.816 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$2.82 \mathrm{s} \pm 5.83 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.902 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$964 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.20 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-3.379 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$985 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.4 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.375 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$37.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$361 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.72 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$42.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 218 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 100 entities $$2.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.382 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$1.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.04 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.901 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.94 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.670 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$13.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 139 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579 $$1.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.68 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.364 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 25 entities $$77.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 364 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$24.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$1.56 \mathrm{s} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$50.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.720 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 25 entities $$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.210 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$1.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.262 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$3.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.215 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.539 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.90 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.897 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.433 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 221 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 199 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-33.101 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 207 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 12, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2024
@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Jul 12, 2024
@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 79dbaf6 Jul 12, 2024
140 of 142 checks passed
@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann deleted the t/gen-188-bump-error-stack-to-050 branch July 12, 2024 13:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) area/libs > error-stack Affects the `error-stack` crate (library) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) area/tests New or updated tests
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants