-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create centralized list of flatdata testcases #96
Comments
This makes totally sense. As you said it makes sense to have a schema for each feature. Then every language can implement an integration test per schema, using generator to generate the corresponding builder/reader. This btw would also allow easily to create a feature matrix.
… On Feb 23, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Christian Vetter ***@***.***> wrote:
Since we now have 4 languages, and each has it's one schemas for tests, I was thinking we should maybe create a central place for testcases:
• for each feature of flatdata a sample schema
• for each corner cases a sample schema
• each with a comment describing what should be tested
That would make it easy to test compliance for new language implementations, and reduce redundancy of the tests.
Opinions @boxdot @imagovrn @gferon ?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
This was referenced Feb 23, 2019
Closed
Implemented in #99 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Since we now have 4 languages, and each has it's one schemas for tests, I was thinking we should maybe create a central place for testcases:
That would make it easy to test compliance for new language implementations, and reduce redundancy of the tests.
Opinions @boxdot @imagovrn @gferon ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: