"idle"->"closed" transition #991
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Lukasa
approved these changes
Nov 29, 2021
draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis.xml
Outdated
| </front> | ||
| </reference> | ||
| </front> | ||
| </reference> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this whitespace change intentional?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, my editor does a cleanup when I close it, and I caught this. I made the change on the main branch, so this is redundant (and wrong).
I improved the text along the lines Jörg suggested. However, I realized that the transition should really be in the diagram. That's basically impossible given the nature of the diagram, but it's worth including in the description at least.
martinthomson
force-pushed
the
idle-closed
branch
from
ab02f5d
to
d26bd29
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I improved the text along the lines Jörg suggested. However, I realized
that the transition should really be in the diagram. That's basically
impossible given the nature of the diagram, but it's worth including in
the description at least.
For #990.