Sealevel igp indexing

[daniel-savu]

Description

Depends on #2583

Indexes IGP payments related to the relayer's data pda address. Unless this address is specified in the config (sealevel.relayer_account ), no filtering is applied and all IGP payments are stored in the local database.

Drive-by changes

• Sets HYP_BASE_GASPAYMENTENFORCEMENT in run-locally for the relayer, to test that it correctly indexes the IGP payment before submitting the message
• A new config section (sealevel) is added to the relayer
• The MessageIndexer trait is replaced with SequenceIndexer<HyperlaneMessage>, renaming fetch_count_at_tip to sequence_at_tip. SequenceIndexer is now common to both the message and igp indexers.
• The parse_addr macro is modified so it can be reused when parsing the sealevel relayer address config too
• rust/utils/sealevel-test.bash is included because I was using it to test locally, but I can remove it if the sealevel e2e test already does all the steps there @mattiecnvr
• Performs a try_into conversion that can be removed once 64-bit block heights #2610 is done

Related issues

• Fixes Sealevel: index gas payments in relayer #2501

Backward compatibility

Testing

e2e tests but the pipeline is failing, likely fixed by #2602

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (17a6e79) 64.50% compared to head (c17129a) 64.50%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2585   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   64.50%   64.50%           
=======================================
  Files          91       91           
  Lines        1386     1386           
  Branches      185      185           
=======================================
  Hits          894      894           
  Misses        485      485           
  Partials        7        7           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mattiekat]

Approved assuming the E2E tests get resolved

[tkporter]

LGTM! Only thing that's important is my question about backward sequence indexing

[tkporter]

lgtm! some suggestions and questions