Skip to content

Conversation

aaron-steinfeld
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Previously we had only declared a netty constraint on our server util package, but both our grpc clients and servers use netty as transport. Adding the constraint to client lib here.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 10, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #30 (137e943) into main (8a5e959) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main      #30   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     70.22%   70.22%           
  Complexity      105      105           
=========================================
  Files            18       18           
  Lines           309      309           
  Branches         22       22           
=========================================
  Hits            217      217           
  Misses           74       74           
  Partials         18       18           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 70.22% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8a5e959...137e943. Read the comment docs.

@aaron-steinfeld aaron-steinfeld merged commit 84e5de1 into main Jun 10, 2022
@aaron-steinfeld aaron-steinfeld deleted the add-client-netty-constraint branch June 10, 2022 13:39
@github-actions
Copy link

Unit Test Results

12 files  ±0  12 suites  ±0   13s ⏱️ -2s
57 tests ±0  57 ✔️ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 84e5de1. ± Comparison against base commit 8a5e959.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants