Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a citation file #691

Closed
danielhuppmann opened this issue Feb 28, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #695
Closed

Add a citation file #691

danielhuppmann opened this issue Feb 28, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #695
Assignees

Comments

@danielhuppmann
Copy link
Member

danielhuppmann commented Feb 28, 2023

Please add a citation.cff, see https://citation-file-format.github.io/cff-initializer-javascript

I suggest to use all (non-marginal) contributors as authors, and add the MESSAGEix manuscript (Huppmann et al., 2019), as a "related resource".

This is related to a request from the Horizon Europe Project PRISMA by @tscheypidi

fyi @khaeru @volker-krey

@glatterf42
Copy link
Member

Where do we draw the line for contributors being 'marginal'? At least ten commits? This would exclude Gamze, but only for now. If she makes one more commit, we'd have to adapt this file. We could simply include everyone from https://github.com/iiasa/message_ix/graphs/contributors . I think it's only fair and doesn't hurt anyone.

@glatterf42
Copy link
Member

Generally, I have not included any email addresses. I have tried to look people up on Orcid and added IDs whenever I found them. Same names still made trouble, though: with Miguel Poblete Cazenave, I have found Poblete as a surname, Cazenave as a surname, and Poblete-Cazenave as a surname, so currently, I set up Poblete as a second given name.
For the contributor lumbric, I couldn't find any name, so excluded them from the file.
Other notes I took in the process:

  • Zenodo doesn't update itself automatically, so while e.g. I am a contributor now on Github, I'm not listed as such on Zenodo
  • We might want to update version-specific stuff whenever that changes/becomes important
  • With the doi as I have extracted it, one finds a 2018 version of the paper under some semi-obscure link. Which doi should be used?

@glatterf42 glatterf42 mentioned this issue Mar 2, 2023
3 tasks
@glatterf42 glatterf42 linked a pull request Mar 3, 2023 that will close this issue
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants