Skip to content

🎨 Add STATIC_ASSERT #164

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2024
Merged

🎨 Add STATIC_ASSERT #164

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

elbeno
Copy link
Contributor

@elbeno elbeno commented Oct 28, 2024

Problem:

  • ct_check<cond>.template emit<msg>() is not so ergonomic to use.

Solution:

  • Add STATIC_ASSERT which does approximately the same thing, but in a more easy-to-use form.

@elbeno
🎨 Add STATIC_ASSERT
9f240cb 
Problem:
- `ct_check<cond>.template emit<msg>()` is not so ergonomic to use.

Solution:
- Add `STATIC_ASSERT` which does approximately the same thing, but in a more
  easy-to-use form.
@bdeane-intel bdeane-intel mentioned this pull request Oct 28, 2024
Merged
@bdeane-intel
Copy link
Contributor

NOTE: STATIC_ASSERT(cond, msg) is an expression that evaluates to the value of cond.

lukevalenty
lukevalenty approved these changes Oct 29, 2024
View reviewed changes
@elbeno elbeno merged commit 9488ac9 into intel:main Oct 29, 2024
32 checks passed
@elbeno elbeno deleted the add-static-assert branch October 29, 2024 18:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lukevalenty lukevalenty lukevalenty approved these changes

@mjcaisse-intel mjcaisse-intel Awaiting requested review from mjcaisse-intel

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@elbeno @bdeane-intel @lukevalenty